Friends of the Secular Café: Forums
Council of Ex-Muslims of Britain
Talk Freethought
Rational Skepticism Forum
EvC Forum: Evolution vs. Creation
Living Nonreligion Discussion Forum
The Round Table (RatPags)
Talk Rational!
Blogs
Blue Collar Atheist
Camels With Hammers
Ebonmuse: Daylight Atheism
Nontheist Nexus
The Re-Enlightenment
Rosa Rubicondior
The Skeptical Zone
Watching the Deniers
Others
Christianity Disproved
Count Me Out
Ebon Musings
Freethinker.co.uk
 
       

Go Back   Secular Café > Science and Stuff > Creation & Alternative Science

Notices

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 15 Jun 2017, 08:32 PM   #673461 / #1
lpetrich
Smart Designer
SysAdmin; Mod: LU&E, C&AS
 
lpetrich's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Lebanon, OR, USA
Posts: 14,016
Default Creationist not allowed to sample the Grand Canyon

A Creationist Sues the Grand Canyon for Religious Discrimination - The Atlantic
That's Dr. Andrew Snelling.
Quote:
Last week, Snelling sued park administrators and the Department of Interior, which administers the national parks program, because they would not grant him a permit to collect 50 to 60 fist-sized rocks. All research in the national park is restricted, especially if it requires removing material. But the Grand Canyon does host 80 research projects a year, ranging from archaeology digs to trout tracking.

Alliance Defending Freedom, a Christian legal advocacy group that filed the lawsuit on behalf of Snelling, alleged discrimination by the park. “National Park Service: Research in Grand Canyon okay for geologists … but not Christian ones,” read the headline on their press release. (Interior department and NPS spokespeople declined to comment because of the pending litigation.)
Creationist geologist sues U.S. park service after it rejects request to collect samples in Grand Canyon | Science | AAAS
Quote:
In the suit filed earlier this month, the Australian geologist, Andrew Snelling, says that religious discrimination was behind the National Park Service's (NRS's) decision to deny him a permit to gather samples from four locations in the park. Snelling had hoped to gather the rocks to support the creationist belief that a global flood about 4,300 years ago was responsible for rock layers and fossil deposits around the world.

NPS's actions "demonstrate animus towards the religious viewpoints of Dr. Snelling," the complaint alleges, "and violate Dr. Snelling's free exercise rights by imposing inappropriate and unnecessary religious tests to his access to the park."
He did some work on the Koongarra uranium deposit in Australia's Northern Territory. After that,
Quote:
From 1998 to 2007, Snelling was a geology expert at the Creation Science Foundation and has since worked for Kentucky-based Answers in Genesis, an organization that investigates geology "from a Biblical perspective."

He's also been an interpreter on more than 30 river trips in the Grand Canyon, which has been a central area of study for creationist geologists.
But there is a very interesting fact about Dr. Snelling. Will the Real Dr Snelling Please Stand Up? Paleontologist Alex Ritchie argues that there seems to be two Drs. Andrew Snelling. They have the same educational qualifications and the same mailing addresses, but they have very different beliefs about the Earth's history, and they seldom or never cite each other's work.

Snelling #1 is a young-earth creationist and a believer in Flood Geology. He believes that Noah's Flood did some major reshaping of the Earth's surface.

Snelling #2 is a mainstream geologist who has published on uranium mineralization in some Proterozoic and older Australian rock formations. He seems to believe that the Earth's surface has been continually reshaped over its history, over a much longer time than Snelling #1 believes that Earth to have existed.

(Wikipedia)Andrew A. Snelling lists publications by both Snellings, and I've found publications by Snelling #2 in Google Scholar.


So it seems that Snelling #1 ought to have asked Snelling #2 about what mainstream geologists would consider a good proposal for sampling the Grand Canyon.


He has responded in Andrew Snelling answers Alex Ritchie
Quote:
The problem is that these hard-line evolutionists are so blinkered that they can't see how a person like myself in such a situation is forced to use their evolutionary terminology whether we like it or not. In other words, even though I could have appealed to the editor of the monograph it would have been to no avail, because the reviewers would have also insisted on the conventional terminology, particularly as one of the reviewers was one of the researchers having done the standard work on the regional geology of that area. It is ludicrous to suggest any hypocrisy or two-facedness.
lpetrich is offline   Reply With Quote top bottom
Old 15 Jun 2017, 09:06 PM   #673462 / #2
Jobar
Zen Hedonist
Admin; Mod: Religion, The Smoking Section
 
Jobar's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Georgia
Posts: 25,794
Default

Wonder what he intended to do with those rocks. Undoubtedly something dumb...
Jobar is offline   Reply With Quote top bottom
Old 15 Jun 2017, 09:52 PM   #673463 / #3
plebian
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2015
Location: America
Posts: 2,768
Default

1. collect 50 or so fist sized rocks from the grand canyon.
2. ??
3. profit.
plebian is offline   Reply With Quote top bottom
Old 16 Jun 2017, 05:31 PM   #673483 / #4
lpetrich
Smart Designer
SysAdmin; Mod: LU&E, C&AS
 
lpetrich's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Lebanon, OR, USA
Posts: 14,016
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Jobar View Post
Wonder what he intended to do with those rocks. Undoubtedly something dumb...
Like some hopelessly specious "demonstration" that they must have been laid down in Noah's Flood.

Quote:
Originally Posted by plebian View Post
1. collect 50 or so fist sized rocks from the grand canyon.
2. ??
3. profit.
#2 is likely look for "evidence" of Noah's Flood in them -- AS is a Flood Geologist.
lpetrich is offline   Reply With Quote top bottom
Old 16 Jun 2017, 05:51 PM   #673484 / #5
lpetrich
Smart Designer
SysAdmin; Mod: LU&E, C&AS
 
lpetrich's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Lebanon, OR, USA
Posts: 14,016
Default

As to AS's moaning and groaning that he had to use mainstream-geology timescales and mechanisms, there are some ways out.

Philip Gosse's created-appearance hypothesis. PG believed that the Universe runs in cycles, and thus that the Universe had to have been created in the middle of those cycles. This had the side effect of making the Universe seem much older than it actually us.

But to many people, that hypothesis seems like divine fraudulence.

Another is the doctrine that some medieval philosophers had allegedly believed, the "double truth", separate truths of reason and revelation. Thus, AS #1's position would be the truth of revelation and AS #2's position the truth of reason.
lpetrich is offline   Reply With Quote top bottom
Old 16 Jun 2017, 05:55 PM   #673486 / #6
plebian
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2015
Location: America
Posts: 2,768
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by lpetrich View Post
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jobar View Post
Wonder what he intended to do with those rocks. Undoubtedly something dumb...
Like some hopelessly specious "demonstration" that they must have been laid down in Noah's Flood.

Quote:
Originally Posted by plebian View Post
1. collect 50 or so fist sized rocks from the grand canyon.
2. ??
3. profit.
#2 is likely look for "evidence" of Noah's Flood in them -- AS is a Flood Geologist.
What does it mean to be a "flood geologist"?
plebian is offline   Reply With Quote top bottom
Old 16 Jun 2017, 08:53 PM   #673496 / #7
lpetrich
Smart Designer
SysAdmin; Mod: LU&E, C&AS
 
lpetrich's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Lebanon, OR, USA
Posts: 14,016
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by plebian View Post
What does it mean to be a "flood geologist"?
Someone who believes in flood geology, a version of geology that is popular among young-earth creationists. According to flood geology, Noah's Flood was a big worldwide flood, and it deposited a lot of sediment and otherwise heavily reshaped our planet's surface.
lpetrich is offline   Reply With Quote top bottom
Old 17 Jun 2017, 09:37 AM   #673525 / #8
praxis
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2011
Posts: 3,340
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Jobar View Post
Wonder what he intended to do with those rocks. Undoubtedly something dumb...
Stone an adulterer?
praxis is offline   Reply With Quote top bottom
Old 27 Aug 2017, 02:53 PM   #676230 / #9
espritch
Senior Member
 
espritch's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Posts: 1,688
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by plebian View Post
1. collect 50 or so fist sized rocks from the grand canyon.
2. ??
3. profit.

Isn't number three supposed to be "Massive profit!"?
espritch is offline   Reply With Quote top bottom
Old 28 Aug 2017, 02:52 PM   #676243 / #10
Ozymandias
________________
 
Ozymandias's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Posts: 7,911
Default

I had a conversation recently with someone religious and happened to mention Noah's Ark as "mythology". I was astounded that this person corrected me to claim that it actually happened! I didn't think such people existed any more.

To be fair, I am certain that no-one at the church my wife goes to thinks it was literally true. (Coincidentally, I happened to be chatting with the minister from my wife's church at the gym this morning and mentioned the Noah's Ark incident. We both had a good laugh, so he obviously agrees it is not literally true.)
Ozymandias is offline   Reply With Quote top bottom
Old 17 Sep 2017, 01:36 PM   #676852 / #11
subsymbolic
screwtape
Mod: Philosophy & Morality, Smoking Section
 
subsymbolic's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: under the gnomon
Posts: 13,232
Default

There's a perfectly sound argument that it did happen. Back when Jehovah was still Enlil and Enki, the flood was slightly less floody and was merely a major flood of the Euphrates river with heavy rains that washed The Ark (and Utnapishkin (Noah) all the way from Shuruppak to Dilman (Central Iraq to Bahrain).

Once you start to get location and detail like that, the idea that there was particularly heavy flooding that stuck in people's minds and kicked off some major mythology sounds pretty believable.

They just have to stop exaggerating, because it isn't so hard to prove that this is where the flood that inspired the Bible happened...
subsymbolic is offline   Reply With Quote top bottom
Old 17 Sep 2017, 05:06 PM   #676860 / #12
Tubby
omnibus nabisco
 
Tubby's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2013
Location: USA
Posts: 3,575
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Ozymandias View Post
I had a conversation recently with someone religious and happened to mention Noah's Ark as "mythology". I was astounded that this person corrected me to claim that it actually happened! I didn't think such people existed any more.
I know of Christians today who insist Lot's wife actually was turned to stone in the blink of an eye.
Tubby is online now   Reply With Quote top bottom
Old 18 Sep 2017, 05:28 AM   #676879 / #13
Hermit
Metierioric fail
 
Hermit's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2014
Posts: 5,730
Default

Some Christians even go as far as believing that someone who was executed came back to life three days later.

I don't know how many of them consider themselves to be cannibals, though. Catholic dogma about transubstantiation, if true, it means that Catholics at least really are. The fact that the alleged donor of his own flesh and blood encouraged his followers to cannibalise him makes them no less so.

(Not loaded: bAF35dekiAY)
(View video on YouTube)
Hermit is offline   Reply With Quote top bottom
Old 19 Sep 2017, 02:09 PM   #676921 / #14
Worldtraveller
Will work for fun.
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: S. OR.
Posts: 3,715
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Tubby View Post
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ozymandias View Post
I had a conversation recently with someone religious and happened to mention Noah's Ark as "mythology". I was astounded that this person corrected me to claim that it actually happened! I didn't think such people existed any more.
I know of Christians today who insist Lot's wife actually was turned to stone in the blink of an eye.
I thought it was a pillar of salt? Or am I thinking of a different fable? I can't keep them all straight.
Worldtraveller is offline   Reply With Quote top bottom
Old 20 Sep 2017, 03:16 AM   #676951 / #15
lpetrich
Smart Designer
SysAdmin; Mod: LU&E, C&AS
 
lpetrich's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Lebanon, OR, USA
Posts: 14,016
Default

In that story, she got turned into a pillar of salt.
lpetrich is offline   Reply With Quote top bottom
Reply

Lower Navigation
Go Back   Secular Café > Science and Stuff > Creation & Alternative Science

Bookmarks

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 05:52 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2017, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
 
Ocean Zero by vBSkins.com | Customised by Antechinus