Friends of the Secular Café: Forums
Council of Ex-Muslims of Britain
Talk Freethought
Rational Skepticism Forum
EvC Forum: Evolution vs. Creation
Living Nonreligion Discussion Forum
The Round Table (RatPags)
Talk Rational!
Blogs
Blue Collar Atheist
Camels With Hammers
Ebonmuse: Daylight Atheism
Nontheist Nexus
The Re-Enlightenment
Rosa Rubicondior
The Skeptical Zone
Watching the Deniers
Others
Christianity Disproved
Count Me Out
Ebon Musings
Freethinker.co.uk
 
       

Go Back   Secular Café > Intellectual Debate and Discussion Forums > Philosophy & Morality

Notices

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 03 Feb 2018, 07:27 PM   #683425 / #1
BWE
twisting truth since 1957
 
BWE's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: one of the unnamed sidestreets of happiness
Posts: 9,651
Default Where does systems theory fit into philosophy?

What can't be defined and modeled systemically?
BWE is offline   Reply With Quote top bottom
Old 03 Feb 2018, 07:47 PM   #683428 / #2
Koyaanisqatsi
Semper oppugnant quod max
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Posts: 8,371
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by BWE View Post
What can't be defined and modeled systemically?
I guess that would hinge on what is doing the modeling as opposed to what is merely experiencing the model.
__________________
Stupidity is not intellen
Koyaanisqatsi is offline   Reply With Quote top bottom
Old 03 Feb 2018, 10:41 PM   #683436 / #3
BWE
twisting truth since 1957
 
BWE's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: one of the unnamed sidestreets of happiness
Posts: 9,651
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Koyaanisqatsi View Post
Quote:
Originally Posted by BWE View Post
What can't be defined and modeled systemically?
I guess that would hinge on what is doing the modeling as opposed to what is merely experiencing the model.
That's sort of among the general points that make philosophy relevant at all. Unless, I suppose, you have a viewpoint that assumes some sort of externalized objectivity is possible.

At any rate, assume it has to do with human knowledge.
BWE is offline   Reply With Quote top bottom
Old 03 Feb 2018, 11:00 PM   #683437 / #4
BWE
twisting truth since 1957
 
BWE's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: one of the unnamed sidestreets of happiness
Posts: 9,651
Default

http://www.radiolab.org/story/91712-limits-of-science/
BWE is offline   Reply With Quote top bottom
Old 04 Feb 2018, 05:05 AM   #683447 / #5
Jobar
Zen Hedonist
Admin; Mod: Religion, The Smoking Section
 
Jobar's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Georgia
Posts: 26,213
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by BWE View Post
What can't be defined and modeled systemically?
How about the relation of models to what is being modeled? To paraphrase Lao Tzu, 'The Tao which can be modeled is not the true Tao.'
Jobar is offline   Reply With Quote top bottom
Old 04 Feb 2018, 11:51 AM   #683453 / #6
lpetrich
Smart Designer
SysAdmin; Mod: LU&E, C&AS
 
lpetrich's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Lebanon, OR, USA
Posts: 14,426
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by BWE View Post
What can't be defined and modeled systemically?
I must first ask: what is "systems theory"?
lpetrich is offline   Reply With Quote top bottom
Old 04 Feb 2018, 04:09 PM   #683457 / #7
BWE
twisting truth since 1957
 
BWE's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: one of the unnamed sidestreets of happiness
Posts: 9,651
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by lpetrich View Post
Quote:
Originally Posted by BWE View Post
What can't be defined and modeled systemically?
I must first ask: what is "systems theory"?
The modern extension of cybernetics. Principle thinkers are probably ludwig bertelanffy, donnella meadows and Peter senge. It was given a philosophy edge by Ervin Laszlo in a book called introduction to systems philosophy.

Jobar, thanks. I will think on that for a bit.
BWE is offline   Reply With Quote top bottom
Old 04 Feb 2018, 04:15 PM   #683458 / #8
BWE
twisting truth since 1957
 
BWE's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: one of the unnamed sidestreets of happiness
Posts: 9,651
Default

Also, jay forrester should have been named there.
Btw, speaking of cybernetics, for anyone who is interested in reading the notes of w. Ross Ashby, his entire set of notebooks has been published on the site maintained by his estate. Because he indexed them himself, the index links are really good navigation tools.

I'll see if i can dig up the link. It's an exercise in brilliance.
BWE is offline   Reply With Quote top bottom
Old 04 Feb 2018, 04:25 PM   #683461 / #9
BWE
twisting truth since 1957
 
BWE's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: one of the unnamed sidestreets of happiness
Posts: 9,651
Default

http://www.rossashby.info/journal/volume/index.html

Here ya go. His book introduction to cybernetics is also available free online. It's definitely dated now but it's a fascinating read still.
BWE is offline   Reply With Quote top bottom
Old 04 Feb 2018, 04:31 PM   #683462 / #10
BWE
twisting truth since 1957
 
BWE's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: one of the unnamed sidestreets of happiness
Posts: 9,651
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Jobar View Post
Quote:
Originally Posted by BWE View Post
What can't be defined and modeled systemically?
How about the relation of models to what is being modeled? To paraphrase Lao Tzu, 'The Tao which can be modeled is not the true Tao.'
Jobar, this is a thought provoking post. I hadn't really thought of the question as an ontological position before you said that. Basically, I was thinking methodologically or epidemiologically. Laszlo's book has an ontological bent to it but I sort of skimmed over that part because I use a fairly Buddhist ontology (or Taoist) myself and hadn't connected systems thinking to it. Your question proposes a way in to that I think.
BWE is offline   Reply With Quote top bottom
Old 04 Feb 2018, 07:53 PM   #683466 / #11
Jobar
Zen Hedonist
Admin; Mod: Religion, The Smoking Section
 
Jobar's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Georgia
Posts: 26,213
Default

I'm sure you're aware that I am all for attempting systematic understanding of all things, including ideas. Though there seem to be limits on how much we can understand that way-

In the world of the large
And the world of the small
We approach stunning mysteries
Forming hyperbolic walls.
Jobar is offline   Reply With Quote top bottom
Reply

Lower Navigation
Go Back   Secular Café > Intellectual Debate and Discussion Forums > Philosophy & Morality

Bookmarks

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 11:22 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2018, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
 
Ocean Zero by vBSkins.com | Customised by Antechinus